proxmox ext4 vs xfs. My question is, since I have a single boot disk, would it. proxmox ext4 vs xfs

 
 My question is, since I have a single boot disk, would itproxmox ext4 vs xfs To me it looks it is worth to try conversion of EXT4 to XFS and obviously need to either have full backup or snapshots in case of virtual machines or even azure linux vms especially you can take os disk snapshot

Copied! # xfs_growfs file-system -D new-size. 3. The EXT4 f ile system is 48-bit with a maximum file size of 1 exbibyte, depending on the host operating system. 1. Set your Proxmox zfs mount options accordingly (via chroot) reboot and hope it comes up. Complete operating system (Debian Linux, 64-bit) Proxmox Linux kernel with ZFS support. Sistemas de archivos en red 27. The ID should be the name you can easily identify the store, we use the same name as the name of the directory itself. LVM vs. Snapshots, transparent compression and quite importantly blocklevel checksums. No idea about the esxi VMs, but when you run the Proxmox installer you can select ZFS RAID 0 as the format for the boot drive. This includes workload that creates or deletes large numbers of small files in a single thread. 3 and following this guide to install it on a Hetzner server with ZFS Encryption enabled. What the installer sets up as default depends on the target file system. With classic filesystems, the data of every file has fixed places spread across the disk. For a while, MySQL (not Maria DB) had performance issues on XFS with default settings, but even that is a thing of the past. 44. I’m just about to dive into proxmox and install it on my Microserver G10+ but after doing a lot of reading about proxmox the one thing I’m not to sure about is where would be the best place to install it on my setup. You can see several XFS vs ext4 benchmarks on phoronix. Install proxmox backup server with ext4 inside proxmox. It may consume a lot of RAM if you'll enable deduplication feature, but I think it makes sense only for backup servers and similar storage scenarios, not for casual users/gamers. 3. There are plenty of benefits for choosing XFS as a file system: XFS works extremely well with large files; XFS is known for its robustness and speed; XFS is particularly proficient at parallel input/output (I/O. 52TB I want to dedicate to GlusterFS (which will then be linked to k8s nodes running on the VMs through a storage class). A directory is a file level storage, so you can store any content type like virtual disk images, containers, templates, ISO images or backup files. XFS, EXT4, and BTRFS are file systems commonly used in Linux-based operating systems. For example, xfs cannot shrink. you're all. 1. ) Then, once Proxmox is installed, you can create a thin lvm pool encompassing the entire SSD. I just got my first home server thanks to a generous redditor, and I'm intending to run Proxmox on it. Because of this, and because EXT4 seems to have better TRIM support, my habit is to make SSD boot/root drives EXT4, and non-root bulk data spinning-rust drives/arrays XFS. Hello in a few threads it has been mentioned that in most cases using ext4 is faster and just as stable as xfs . g. The process occurs in the opposite. They deploy mdadm, LVM and ext4 or btrfs (though btrfs only in single drive mode, they use LVM and mdadm to span the volume for. The host is proxmox 7. I figured my choices were to either manually balance the drive usage (1 Gold for direct storage/backup of the M. Between 2T and 4T on a single disk, any of these would probably have similar performance. That XFS performs best on fast storage and better hardware allowing more parallelism was my conclusion too. This is a constraint of the ext4 filesystem, which isn't built to handle large block sizes, due to its design and goals of general-purpose efficiency. I find the VM management on Proxmox to be much better than Unraid. " I use ext4 for local files and a. I've never had an issue with either, and currently run btrfs + luks. However, from my understanding Proxmox distinguishes between (1) OS storage and (2) VM storage, which must run on seperate disks. Supported LBA Sizes (NSID 0x1) Id Fmt Data Metadt Rel_Perf 0 - 512 0 2 1. EvertM. In the vast realm of virtualization, Proxmox VE stands out as a robust, open-source solution that many IT professionals and hobbyists alike have come to rely on. 2: On file based storages, snapshots are possible with the qcow2 format. The problem here is that overlay2 only supports EXT4 and XFS as backing filesystems, not ZFS. Shrink / Reduce a volume with an LVM-XFS partition. ZFS file-system benchmarks using the new ZFS On Linux release that is a native Linux kernel module implementing the Sun/Oracle file-system. sdb is Proxmox and the rest are in a raidz zpool named Asgard. xfs_growfs is used to resize and apply the changes. Improve this answer. In terms of XFS vs Ext4, XFS is superior to Ext4 in the following. at. 2 we changed the LV data to a thin pool, to provide snapshots and native performance of the disk. The ability to "zfs send" your entire disk to another machine or storage while the system is still running is great for backups. This means that you have access to the entire range of Debian packages, and that the base system is well documented. The Proxmox community has been around for many years and offers help and support for Proxmox VE, Proxmox Backup Server, and Proxmox Mail Gateway. Starting with Proxmox VE 3. (Install proxmox on the NVME, or on another SATA SSD). That XFS performs best on fast storage and better hardware allowing more parallelism was my conclusion too. The Proxmox VE installer, which partitions the local disk (s) with ext4, XFS, BTRFS (technology preview), or ZFS and installs the operating system. service (7. The Proxmox VE installer, which partitions the local disk(s) with ext4, XFS, BTRFS (technology preview), or ZFS and installs the operating system. I understand Proxmox 6 now has SSD TRIM support on ZFS, so that might help. So the rootfs lv, as well as the log lv, is in each situation a normal. Dom0 mostly on f2fs on NVME, default pool root of about half the qubes on XFS on ssd (didn’t want to mess with LVM so need fs supports reflinks and write amplification much less than BTRFS) and everything. Fortunately, a zvol can be formatted as EXT4 or XFS. Other helpful info. The reason is simple. 14 Git and tested in their default/out-of-the-box. The server I'm working with is: Depending on the space in question, I typically end up using both ext4 (on lvm/mdadm) and zfs (directly over raw disks). It has zero protection against bit rot (either detection or correction). to edit the disk again. Starting new omv 6 server. The Proxmox team works very hard to make sure you are running the best software and getting stable updates and security enhancements, as well as quick enterprise support. Dropping performance in case with 4 threads for ext4 is a signal that there still are contention issues. Latency for both XFS and EXT4 were comparable in. There are results for “single file” with O_DIRECT case (sysbench fileio 16 KiB blocksize random write workload): ext4 1 thread: 87 MiB/sec. I’d still choose ZFS. The reason that Ext4 is often recommended is that it is the most used and trusted filesystem out there on Linux today. Reply reply Yes you have miss a lot of points: - btrfs is not integrated in the PMX web interface (for many good reasons ) - btrfs develop path is very slow with less developers compares with zfs (see yourself how many updates do you have in the last year for zfs and for btrfs) - zfs is cross platform (linux, bsd, unix) but btrfs is only running on linux. Even if you don’t get the advantages that come from multi-disk systems, you do get the luxury of ZFS snapshots and replication. Red Hat Training. by carum carvi » Sat Apr 25, 2020 1:14 am. sdb is Proxmox and the rest are in a raidz zpool named Asgard. No ext4, você pode ativar cotas ao criar o sistema de arquivo ou mais tarde em um sistema de arquivo existente. I personally haven't noticed any difference in RAM consumption when switched from ext4 about a year ago. You're working on an XFS filesystem, in this case you need to use xfs_growfs instead of resize2fs. The last step is to resize the file system to grow all the way to fill added space. x and older) or a per-filesystem instance of [email protected] of 2022 the internet states the ext4 filesystem can support volumes with sizes up to 1 exbibyte (EiB) and single files with sizes up to 16 tebibytes (TiB) with the. I have sufficient disks to create an HDD ZFS pool and a SSD ZFS pool, as well as a SSD/NVMe for boot drive. 3. I've never had an issue with either, and currently run btrfs + luks. Starting with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7. €420,00EUR. Requierement: 1. Since we have used a Filebench workloads for testing, our idea was to find the best FS for each test. For example, if a BTRFS file system is mounted at /mnt/data2 and its pve-storage. There are a couple of reasons that it's even more strongly recommended with ZFS, though: (1) The filesystem is so robust that the lack of ECC leaves a really big and obvious gap in the data integrity chain (I recall one of the ZFS devs saying that using ZFS without ECC is akin to putting a screen door on a submarine). Will sagen, wenn Du mit hohen IO-Delay zu kämpfen hast, sorge für mehr IOPS (Verteilung auf mehr Spindeln, z. Available storage types. Proxmox VE Linux kernel with KVM and LXC support. You either copy everything twice or not. Which file system would you consider the best for my needs and what should I be aware of when considering the filesystem you recommend? Please add your thoughts and comment below. They perform differently for some specific workloads like creating or deleting tenthousands of files / folders. 1) using an additional single 50GB drive per node formatted as ext4. xfs 4 threads: 97 MiB/sec. RAID. Proxmox VE currently uses one of two bootloaders depending on the disk setup selected in the installer. Well if you set up a pool with those disks you would have different vdev sizes and. After installation, in proxmox env, partition SSD in ZFS for three, 32GB root, 16GB swap, and 512MB boot. XFS will generally have better allocation group. 元数据错误行为 在 ext4 中,当文件系统遇到元数据错误时您可以配置行为。默认的行为是继续操作。当 xfs. Get your own in 60 seconds. BTRFS is working on per-subvolume settings (new data written in home. Get your own in 60 seconds. (Equivalent to running update-grub on systems with ext4 or xfs on root). all kinds for nice features (like extents, subsecond timestamps) which ext3 does not have. Tens of thousands of happy customers have a Proxmox subscription. Btrfs trails the other options for a database in terms of latency and throughput. And you might just as well use EXT4. Step 4: Resize / partition to fill all space. Xfs is very opinionated as filesystems go. . I've got a SansDigital EliteRAID storage unit that is currently set to on-device RAID 5 and is using usb passthrough to a Windows Server vm. XFS and ext4 aren't that different. g to create the new partition. But I was more talking to the XFS vs EXT4 comparison. The ext4 file system is still fully supported in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 and can be selected at installation. This will create a. You need to confirm the filesystem type you're using, Red Hat uses the XFS filesystem, but you can check the filesystem with lsblk -f or df -Th. What we mean is that we need something like resize2fs (ext4) for enlarge or shrunk on the fly, and not required to use another filesystem to store the dump for the resizing. Distribution of one file system to several devices. Interesting. 15 comments. 527660] XFS: loop5(22218) possible memory allocation deadlock size 44960 in kmem_alloc (mode:0x2400240) As soon as I get. could go with btrfs even though it's still in beta and not recommended for production yet. Features of the XFS and ZFS. Navigate to the official Proxmox Downloads page and select Proxmox Virtual Environment. What you get in return is a very high level of data consistency and advanced features. My question is, since I have a single boot disk, would it. 0, XFS is the default file system instead of ext4. Profile both ZFS and ext4 to see how performance works out on your system in your use-case. Create snapshot options in Proxmox. using ESXi and Proxmox hypervisors on identical hardware, same VM parameters and the same guest OS – Linux Ubuntu 20. I am setting up a homelab using Proxmox VE. Select I agree on the EULA 8. It is the default file system in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7. Here is the basic command for ext4: # resize2fs /dev/vg00/sales-lv 3T Reduce capacity. XFS is a robust and mature 64-bit journaling file system that supports very large files and file systems on a single host. One of the main reasons the XFS file system is used is for its support of large chunks of data. Samsung, in particular, is known for their rock solid reliability. If you make changes and decide they were a bad idea, you can rollback your snapshot. By default, Proxmox will leave lots of room on the boot disk for VM storage. Dude, you are a loooong way from understanding what it takes to build a stable file server. I'd like to install Proxmox as the hypervisor, and run some form of NAS software (TRueNAS or something) and Plex. XFS provides a more efficient data organization system with higher performance capabilities but less reliability than ZFS, which offers improved accessibility as well as greater levels of data integrity. ZFS vs USB Hardware Raid. Since we have used a Filebench workloads for testing, our idea was to find the best FS for each test. Results were the same, +/- 10%. EXT4 is still getting quite critical fixes as it follows from commits at kernel. Create a zvol, use it as your VM disk. This of course comes at the cost of not having many important features that ZFS provides. This is not ZFS. J. Things like snapshots, copy-on-write, checksums and more. ZFS is a combined file system and logical volume manager designed by Sun Microsystems. Yes, both BTRFS and ZFS have advanced features that are missing in EXT4. Both Btrfs and ZFS offer built-in RAID support, but their implementations differ. Hi there! I'm not sure which format to use between EXT4, XFS, ZFS and BTRFS for my Proxmox installation, wanting something that once installed will perform. Post by Sabuj Pattanayek Hi, I've seen that EXT4 has better random I/O performance than XFS, especially on small reads and writes. In the table you will see "EFI" on your new drive under Usage column. 04. If you have a NAS or Home server, BTRFS or XFS can offer benefits but then you'll have to do some extensive reading first. On one hand I like the fact that raid is expandable with a single disk at a time instead of a whole vdev in zfs which also comes at the cost of another disk lost to parity. It has some advantages over EXT4. raid-10 mit 6 Platten; oder SSDs, oder Cache). Compressing the data is definitely worth it since there is no speed penalty. After installation, in proxmox env, partition SSD in ZFS for three, 32GB root, 16GB swap, and 512MB boot. Literally just making a new pool with ashift=12, a 100G zvol with default 4k block size, and mkfs. If you have SMR drives, don't use ZFS! And perhaps also not BTRFS, I had a small server which unknown to me had an SMR disk with ZFS proxmox server to experiment with. Austria/Graz. XFS vs Ext4. XFS. I have set up proxmox ve on a dell R720. You will need a ZIL device. ZFS also offers data integrity, not just physical redundancy. This can make differences as there. Note 2: The easiest way to mount a USB HDD on the PVE host is to have it formatted beforehand, we can use any existing Linux (Ubuntu/Debian/CentOS etc. So that's what most Linux users would be familiar with. OpenMediaVault gives users the ability to set up a volume as various different types of filesystems, with the main being Ext4, XFS, and BTRFS. 6-pve1. Compared to classic RAID1, modern FS have two other advantages: - RAID1 is whole device. Elegir entre sistemas de archivos de red y de almacenamiento compartido 27. Similar: Ext4 vs XFS – Which one to choose. Ext4 focuses on providing a reliable and stable file system with good performance. If you are sure there is no data on that disk you want to keep you can wipe it using the webUI: "Datacenter -> YourNode -> Disks -> select the disk you want to wipe. Maybe I am wrong, but in my case I can see more RAM usage on xfs compared with xfs (2 VM with the same load/io, services. In case somebody is looking do the same as I was, here is the solution: Before start, make sure login to PVE web gui, delete local-lvm from Datacenter -> Storage. But I think you should use directory for anything other than normal filesystem like ext4. The Proxmox team works very hard to make sure you are running the best software and getting stable updates and security enhancements, as well as quick enterprise. You can specify a port if your backup. Proxmox Virtual Environment is a complete open-source platform for enterprise virtualization. The ZFS file system combines a volume manager and file. Ability to shrink filesystem. davon aus das erfolgreich geschrieben ist, der Raidcontroller erledigt dies, wenn auch später. 0 ISO Installer. 6. Resize the filesystem on the Logical Volume. With the integrated web-based user interface you can manage VMs and containers, high availability for. EXT4 - I know nothing about this file system. Since NFS and ZFS are both file based storage, I understood that I'd need to convert the RAW files to qcow2. 2, the logical volume “data” is a LVM-thin pool, used to store block based guest. Festplattenkonfiguration -//- zfs-RAID0 -//- EXT4. . Click to expand. XFS still has some reliability issues, but could be good for a large data store where speed matters but rare data loss (e. Sorry to revive this old thread, but I had to ask: Am I wrong to think that the main reason for ZFS never getting into the Linux Kernel is actually a license problem? See full list on linuxopsys. sysinit (RHEL/CentOS 6. e. So what is the optimal configuration? I assume. 2 nvme. 77. I think it probably is a better choice for a single drive setup than ZFS, especially given its lower memory requirements. It can hold up to 1 billion terabytes of data. While RAID 5 and 6 can be compared to RAID Z. Something like ext4 or xfs will generally allocate new blocks less often because they are willing to overwrite a file or post of a file in place. Share. Linux files) and not how they're organized. GitHub. Regardless of your choice of volume manager, you can always use both LVM and ZFS to manage your data across disks and servers when you move onto a VPS platform as well. Hope that answers your question. Unraid runs storage and a few media/download-related containers. With iostat XFS zd0 gave 2. BTRFS and ZFS are metadata vs. The command below creates an ext4 filesystem: proxmox-backup-manager disk fs create datastore1 --disk sde --filesystem ext4. g. ext4 vs brtfs vs zfs vs xfs performance. + Access to Enterprise Repository. Can this be accomplished with ZFS and is. F2FS, XFS, ext4, zfs, btrfs, ntfs, etc. Get your own in 60 seconds. But. Will sagen, wenn Du mit hohen IO-Delay zu kämpfen hast, sorge für mehr IOPS (Verteilung auf mehr Spindeln, z. Some features do use a fair bit of RAM (like automatic deduplication), but those are features that most other filesystems lack entirely. Ext4: cũng giống như Ext3, lưu giữ được những ưu điểm và tính tương thích ngược với phiên bản trước đó. Storages which present block devices (LVM, ZFS, Ceph) will require the raw disk image format, whereas files based storages (Ext4, NFS, CIFS, GlusterFS) will let you to choose either the raw disk image format or the QEMU image format. In conclusion, it is clear that xfs and zfs offer different advantages depending on the user’s needs. 2. There are opinions that for: large files + multi threaded file access -> XFS; smaller files + single threaded -> ext4ZFS can also send and receive file system snapshots, a process which allows users to optimize their disk space. It's absolutely better than EXT4 in just about every way. You also have full ZFS integration in PVE, so that you can use native snapshots with ZFS, but not with XFS. though of course logical volumes within may contain filesystems. Move/Migrate from 1 to 3. Code: mount /media/data. 6. After a week of testing Btrfs on my laptop, I can conclude that there is a noticeable performance penalty vs Ext4 or XFS. Any changes done to the VM's disk contents are stored separately. Starting with Proxmox VE 7. used for files not larger than 10GB, many small files, timemachine backups, movies, books, music. XFS is a 64-bit journaling file system known for its high performance and efficient execution of parallel input/output (I/O) operations. I chose to use Proxmox as the OS for the NAS for ease of management, and also installed Proxmox Backup Server on the same system. I'm always in favor of ZFS because it just has so many features, but it's up to you. Active Member. 1 GB/s on proxmox, 3 GB/s on hyper-v. XFS distributes inodes evenly across the entire file system. Create a VM inside proxmox, use Qcow2 as the VM HDD. You really need to read a lot more, and actually build stuff to. Proxmox VE Linux kernel with KVM and LXC support Complete toolset for administering virtual machines, containers, the host system, clusters and all necessary resources XFS与Ext4性能比较. Best Linux Filesystem for Ethereum Node: EXT4 vs XFX vs BTRFS vs ZFS. I've tried to use the typical mkfs. Januar 2020. XFS was surely a slow-FS on metadata operations, but it has been fixed recently as well. Datacenter > Storage. ZFS brings robustness and stability, while it avoids the corruption of large files. The question is XFS vs EXT4. Now click the Take Screenshot button, as shown in the following screenshot: Creating a snapshot in Proxmox using the web based GUI. Feature-for-feature, it doesn't use significantly more RAM than ext4 or NTFS or anything else does. Proxmox Filesystems Unveiled: A Beginner’s Dive into EXT4 and ZFS. Follow for more stories like this 😊And thus requires more handling (processing) of all the traffic in and out of the container vs bare metal. Please. The compression ratio of gzip and zstd is a bit higher while the write speed of lz4 and zstd is a bit higher. I’d still choose ZFS. ZFS is an advanced filesystem and many of its features focus mainly on reliability. I usually use ext4 on the root (OS) volume along with some space for VMs (that can be run on lvm/ext4). Procedure. It was pretty nice when I last used it with only 2 nodes. 7T 0 part ext4 d8871cd7-11b1-4f75-8cb6-254a6120 72f6 sdd1 8:49 0 3. I've tried to use the typical mkfs. Centos7 on host. Category: HOWTO. What I used for Proxmox is a mix of ext4 and ZFS, both had differing results, but vastly better performance than those shared from Harvester. Exfat is especially recommended for usb sticks and micro/mini SD cards for any device using memory cards. This is a significant difference: The Ext4 file system supports journaling, while Btrfs has a copy-on-write (CoW) feature. 09 MB/s. Edit: Got your question wrong. But they come with the smallest set of features compared to newer filesystems. By far, XFS can handle large data better than any other filesystem on this list and do it reliably too. As a raid0 equivalent, the only additional file integrity you'll get is from its checksums. ZFS is supported by Proxmox itself. Additionally, ZFS works really well with different sized disks and pool expansion from what I've read. The EXT4 f ile system is 48-bit with a maximum file size of 1 exbibyte, depending on the host operating system. Linux filesystems EXT4 vs XFS, what to choose, what is better. This feature allows for increased capacity and reliability. So far EXT4 is at the top of our list because it is more mature than others. 4. ago. 1) Advantages a) Proxmox is primarily a virtualization platform, so you need to build your own NAS from the ground. Storage replication brings redundancy for guests using local storage and reduces migration time. Also, the disk we are testing has contained one of the three FSs: ext4, xfs or btrfs. As modern computing gets more and more advanced, data files get larger and more. This is the same GUID regardless of the filesystem type, which makes sense since the GUID is supposed to indicate what is stored on the partition (e. The kvm guest may even freeze when high IO traffic is done on the guest. I'm doing some brand new installs. directory" it will let you add the LVM and format it as ext4 or xfs If that does not work, just wipe the LVM off the disk and than try adding it. Funny you mention the lack of planning. I have a 1TB ssd as the system drive, which is automatically turned into 1TB LVM, so I can create VMs on it without issue, I also have some HDDs that I want to turn into data drives for the VMs, here comes to my puzzle, should I. Also, with lvm you can have snapshots even with ext4. 1 and a LXC container with Fedora 27. XFS is optimized for large file transfers and parallel I/O operations, while ext4 is optimized for general-purpose use with a focus on security. It was mature and robust. If at all possible please link to your source of this information. It replicates guest volumes to another node so that all data is available without using shared storage. Same could be said of reads, but if you have a TON of memory in the server that's greatly mitigated and work well. The Proxmox Backup Server features strong client-side encryption allowing organizations to back up data to targets that are not fully trusted in a space-efficient manner with the ability to restore VMs, archives, or single objects rapidly. As you can see all the disks Proxmox detects are now shown and we want to select the SSDs of which we want to create a mirror and install Proxmox onto. . Step 3 - Prepare your system. Replication is easy. Over time, these two filesystems have grown to serve very similar needs. This is addressed in this knowledge base article; the main consideration for you will be the support levels available: Ext4 is supported up to 50TB, XFS up to 500TB. Ich selbst nehme da der Einfachheit und. want to run insecure privileged LXCs you would need to bind-mount that SMB share anyway and by directly bind-mounting a ext4/xfs formated thin LV you skip that SMB overhead. BTRFS is working on per-subvolume settings (new data written in. It'll use however much you give it, but it'll also clear out at the first sign of high memory usage. Outside of that discussion the question is about specifically the recovery speed of running fsck / xfs_repair against any volume formatted in xfs vs ext4, the backup part isnt really relevent back in the ext3 days on multi TB volumes u’d be running fsck for days!Now you can create an ext4 or xfs filesystem on the unused disk by navigating to Storage/Disks -> Directory. 7T 0 part ext4 d8871cd7-11b1-4f75-8cb6-254a6120 72f6. After having typed zfs_unlock and waited the system to boot fully, the login takes +25 seconds to complete due to systemd-logind service fails to start. This is necessary should you make. 压测过程中 xfs 在高并发 72个并发情况下出现thread_running 抖动,而ext4 表现比较稳定。. ZFS expects to be in total control, and will behave weird or kicks out disks if you're putting a "smart" HBA between ZFS and the disks. 1. For Proxmox, EXT4 on top of LVM. we are evaluating ZFS for our Proxmox VE future installations over the currently used LVM. From our understanding. I also have a separate zfs pool for either additional storage or VMs running on zfs (for snapshots). We can also set the custom disk or partition sizes through the advanced. ;-). Proxmox Filesystems Unveiled: A Beginner’s Dive into EXT4 and ZFS. Both ext4 and XFS should be able to handle it. Quota journaling: This avoids the need for lengthy quota consistency checks after a crash. • 2 yr. It’s worth trying ZFS either way, assuming you have the time. ext4 on the other hand has delayed allocation and a lot of other goodies that will make it more space efficient. Then i manually setup proxmox and after that, i create a lv as a lvm-thin with the unused storage of the volume group. g. Hello, this day have seen that compression is default on (rpool) lz4 by new installations. 7. Now i noticed that my SSD shows up with 223,57GiB in size under Datacenter->pve->Disks. 5) and the throughput went up to (woopie doo) 11 MB/s on a 1 GHz Ethernet LAN. Via the Phoronix Test Suite a. XFS scales much better on modern multi-threaded workloads. 对应的io利用率 xfs 明显比ext4低,但是cpu 比较高 如果qps tps 在5000以下 etf4 和xfs系统无明显差异。. #6. That's right, XFS "repairs" errors on the fly, whereas ext4 requires you to remount read-only and fsck. Es el sistema de archivos por defecto en Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.